리뷰 탐색기

Two Steps Forward, One Era Back: A Conflicted Review of Civ 7 As a long-time fan of the franchise, I’ve poured hours into Civilization VII desperately wanting it to be my next 3,000-hour obsession. And while there are moments of absolute brilliance that keep me clicking "just one…

After seeing how much they're charging for the DLC's honestly get ****

This game is not Civ 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, or 1. It is different and maybe was a little too different at first. The dev team has really worked hard to bring the game back towards traditional Civ gameplay while still providing a modern and fresh take on the genre. If you want the olde…

Como jugador veterano de la saga (habiendo jugado todas las iteraciones y spin-offs desde el CIV II), es verdad que este juego puede resultar raro al principio, quizá demasiado simplificado y, antes de la actualización a las victorias, las partidas en general tenían tendencia a s…

好玩，机制没有明6复杂。期待新DLC

If I could get a refund, I would. After all the backlash; The team are still happy pumping out DLC civs and leaders like the game and devs are in our good graces.

The prices are getting ridiculous. What was the point of the founder's edition if not for new DLCs?

Founders Edition and then add more paid DLC after this? If someone pays the amount we paid for founders edition you should get all DLC? The clocks ♥♥♥♥ boys.

Civ VII has taken a lot of heat for some of the design changes they packaged into the launch. I enjoyed it from the start, but the updates and expansion DLC have made this game sing. They addressed the criticism in a way that was true to the product they were trying to build AND …

哪怕一年多了依旧还是全方位的半成品，就是个Early Access模式，DLC吃相也相当难看。没入的建议继续观望。

I have 135 hours on Civ VI and 377 hours on Civ V. Despite the outrageous pricing, the ridiculous DLC strategy, and the state the game originally launched in, I do see where they're going with this. A lot of the new mechanics have good bones on them. This is a decent game already…

This is the worst pile of ♥♥♥♥ i have ever played, the art direction has no soul, the UI looks AI generated (not a joke the boxes don't fit), scummy dlc practices hiding basic mechanics behind 30$ price tags, wants you to ♥♥♥♥ your own mom to even start the game basic game functi…

Unfortunately, as a long-time lover of Civilization games all the way back from Civ 2, I have to say that I cannot recommend this game. If this was the first Civ game ever by some indie studio I think I would like it enough despite its flaws to recommend it. But as this is the …

Civilization I is the game that made me a PC gamer. Since then, I've played every Civilization title extensively, along with countless other 4X games over the past 30 years. I deliberately waited until the "Test of Time" update before forming my own opinion about Civilization VII…

I got this game to play with a friend on console, and I gotta say, it's pretty fun. I enjoy it quite a bit. The only problem we encountered was the game constantly reloading after each turn, but all I had to do to fix it was switch to the Vulkan launch option, and it works perfec…

[h1] Finally at a stage where it's worth buying! But still trainer-wheel-tastic! [/h1] On release, the game was a mess. It's now at a stage where I think it's worth buying (on sale). And to be fair to them, they're making lots of updates, though seeing as I paid about €120 for…

50% 할인가에 사면 꽤 괜찮은 게임... 현시점 퀄리티로 출시했으면 대체로부정적 받지는 않았을거임 아직 부족하지만 UI,편의성,시스템 계속 개선되면서 출시초기보단 훨씬 나아졌다 근데 DLC 가격 너무하지 않나 싶다 현대,미래시대 확장팩도 아닌 고작 지도자, 문명 추가를 3만원 넘게 파는건 좀 과한거같음

This game is honestly unplayable due to poor programming. Units constantly just walk the completely opposite direction where you you tell them to go. Embarrassing that this game is a year old and still this bad. It is obvious no one in leadership at Take Two knows anything about…

내가 이돈을주고 이딴쓰레기를 샀다고? 싶은 기분임 문명이라는 프랜차이즈를 살리지도 못했고, 4K 전략시뮬이라는 본질적인 가치에서도 멀어지는 단순 보드게임 수준의 게임성을 가지고 있다는게 제일 큰 단점임 4K 전략시뮬에서는 하나하나의 행동이나 턴소비 만으로도 그게 나중에 큰 차이점이 벌어짐, 예를들어 고전시대때 콜로세움을 지었으면 그 주변으로 도시를 건설해야되서 멀리 확장을 할 필요가 없어지거나, 고전시대에 철을 발견 못했으면 바로 기마병 쪽으로 테크를 변경하거나 하는식으로 변형이 되어야 함 (문…

I've always been a Civ fan, every game has been an upgrade of the game before with better experience. However i can't say the same for Civ VII. Yes it has beter graphics ad cosmetics, the Commander battle system and the vertical city build is great, but the overall gameplay is we…

£100 for drip fed "dlc" whats going on? thats crazy. Spent around a hour trying to see why anyone would even spend £25 for all that dlc. £100! Plus the 2k screen is always in the top corner of the screen while in game? and it says legend enabled. (they call it legend mode and all…

yep, yep, annnnnd yep....been playing since Civ II, and over the years from 1 version to the next it was like "oh, there's something new" or "there's something different" but it never felt like much of a step forward from the previous version....this version (Civ VII) is definite…

I have played all Civ. Moreover, Sid M games even before Civ. Played, Microprose games on C64 and all other platforms. This is a disaster. I am trying to like it; but, it is hard. They still don't get it, you don't take away content, you add more content. You don't mess-up game d…

This is a lazy civ game. They did not add a whole information/modern era. How do you have this era in other civs but for some reason this one only goes to WWI/WWII era technology. This game with try to gouge the player base with updates and DLC that will amount to what they shoul…

I play this game because I have to kill time and distract myself but its been out for a year and they go backwards and cause bugs, Part 2 of 1.3.1 destroyed peace negotiations with lazy hard coding and no actual negotiation, if you hit a block like, its a city, has a wonder, or …

Civ 7 (v1.4.3) – Test of Time Continues As with every update, I started another campaign on default settings to give the developers a fair comparison point. I played Augustus leading Rome, remaining as Rome through every Age Transition. After several complete campaigns on default…

I am updating this review after each patch. I am trying to be positive and giving it benefit of doubt. I will however not by the DLC's not included from the start, unless the game improves significantly. This feels like an indie game made by Civ fans that will be in perpetual ea…

I did not enjot this game when it was released. Now, about 1.5 years later, I do find it worth it, so I'll cautiously recommend it. It's still not without flaw, but all in all fun. I'd suggest to buy on sale (and avoid the DLC). Compared to previous installments and other games …

My review is going from "recommended" to "not recommended". While the game has a solid base, it is now clear that Firaxis has decided to shove the age transition mechanic down our troat and the Test of Time update really was a slap in the face, if not a kick in the balls. The …

Update August 2026: ich lag total falsch. 6-12 Monate bis mir das Spiel Spaß macht war übertrieben optimistisch. Ich erhöhe auf 24 bis 36 Monate.... Von der Grafik mal abgesehen überwiegen für mich die negativen Dinge so stark, das man aktuell absolut von einem Kauf abraten muss…

I have been a fan of Civ games since Civ2, and I've loved every game until this one. Civilization has had peaks and valleys, but the rough flow of the game - start at antiquity and progress to the future - has been consistently fun every iteration. I feel like that has stopped wi…

여러 업데이트가 진행되고 DLC를 전부 구매한 후 평가 수정. 막 출시했을 당시 정가를 주고 샀을 때는 매우 부정적인 수준이었으나, 현재는 그냥 부정적인 수준. 그래픽 표현이나 건물 등의 디테일, 미감은 이전 작들에 비해 나아졌다. 결국 장점은 그래픽 쪽밖에 없다. 시스템이 크게 바뀌었고, 전반적으로 많이 간소화됐다. 시리즈를 처음 접하는 사람이라면 좀 더 편하게 적응할 수 있을 듯하다. 여전히 아쉬운 부분은 3개 시대로 나뉜 구조와 문명 변경 시스템이다. 시대가 전환되는 순간 한 턴 만에…

I'm 48 years old so I have played every Civ since the original. This one is way off. The best I can describe it is that it feels like it is "dumbed down"... like, you've been riding roller coasters for years and the new one is opening and you're all excited and you race to the…

Here are some suggestions for what I think should change to make the game much more interesting. -Strategic resources should remain the same as in Civilization VI. Iron, oil, uranium, and other minerals useful for industry. -Strategic resources should maintain a gap between civ…

Honestly, they are improving Civ 7 quite a bit, and I'm sure there is plenty of information out there on those worthy improvements. My initial review from release until now was positive, actually. However, $30 for 4 civilizations and 2 leaders and 4 wonders is insulting. I pre-…

After updates and new DLC allowing you to play as Japan and Korea in all 3 ages (Just like China at launch) I can say this game is finally better than civ 6

Is this the last Civ game that will come out? No. Is it the last Civ game I will care about? Very likely. Civ VI had a mixed reception as well, but the difference is the developers capitalized on the franchise's momentum and built it into something great. I gave this game a posit…

[EDIT] : Il faut l'ajout d'une ère "futuriste", et plus globalement, le prix du dernier DLC... Complexe de payer si chère pour "si peu", mise à part ça, ils nous faut des stats sur nos parties Il faut une option qui permette de voir l'historique des parties, comment on les a gag…

Firaxis is more interested in selling very expensive DLCs than fixing the game. They still haven't figure out how to properly space the texts in the settings. What a disgrace.