不是一个dlc就两个领袖两个文明就一百多你怎么不去抢
리뷰 탐색기
근간을 만든 2와, 내정을 만든4, 모드와 그래픽 보편성을 챙긴 5 근본을 잃어버리고, 내정도 엉망이며, 문명이라는 아이덴티티도 잃어버렸고. 모딩과 에디팅도 잃어버린 문명7.. 모든 DLC 다 합쳐서 -90%에 사면 ㅍㅌㅊ 그외는 돈낭비
真是给我预购奠基版的恶心坏了,看了最新DLC的内容,这游戏日本玩家有NMB一万人没有,这么爱捧你日本爹的臭脚,SM2K,就该退款,还想着相信你一回,一个DLC100多,我预购奠基版有什么区别吗,真想玩这B游戏的再等个5年吧
前作の劣化版 前作でできたことが出来ない上にUIがクソ 地球マップもワールドエディターもない 史実プレイができない。 しかもDLCで儲けたいのは分かるが、本体の内容をスカスカにして本体に付随させるべきような物をわざわざ分離してDLCで出す性根が気に食わない。 本体もDLCも努力せずに金だけ巻き上げてやろうという性根の腐った作品
They're doling out new Civ's 4 at a time for $30 per DLC. It's a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ rip off. If you like 4x games buy Old World instead. I regret buying this and will never buy and another Civ game again.
this is a strange game, it seems like it was envisioned by someone who played one time at civ 6 and one time at humankind trying to mix the two experiences. The new mechanics would be fine if they didnt completely destroy the core gameplay of both civ and humankind. Also it seem…
원본 리뷰 허브에서 전문 보기 ↗垃圾游戏,半成品游戏,骗钱游戏,我已经购买游戏本体并在游戏属性中关闭所有dlc,只因为steam家庭中有成员拥有全部dlc,就认定我的游戏来自家庭库,让我无法游玩
As someone who has been playing the Civilization series for more than a decade – the VII is a huge disappointment. The game introduces new mechanics and some interesting ideas, but they somehow feel wrong. It moves forward through random events and era transitions, each time …
원본 리뷰 허브에서 전문 보기 ↗not a finished game. still in early stage after years of mistakes they have not learned from. completely unplayable. devs gave up on this game a long time ago. complete money sink, do not waste your money. wait for civ 8 to come out ad hope they actually put out a decent game the…
원본 리뷰 허브에서 전문 보기 ↗Notwithstanding the innumerable other issues with the game - including but not limited to charging $40 for DLC that gives you a new civ./couple of wonders and the fact that the developers crowbarred in such an absurd gameplay mechanic in which you're forced to switch civilization…
원본 리뷰 허브에서 전문 보기 ↗Having played previous Civ games this one is pretty mystifying starting off. Gradually comes to you as you play but its quite different in several ways from previous games. Pace wise its really slow at the start. I've never liked the start of Civ games where all you do is click …
원본 리뷰 허브에서 전문 보기 ↗WHY YOU CAN'T STOP WASTING TIME ON ♥♥♥♥♥♥ ADDITIONAL CONTENT AND START REPAIRING ♥♥♥♥♥♥ UP MULTIPLAYER?????? You should be killed for giving such a piece of ♥♥♥♥ and not even trying to fix it.
Bought the founders edition for a stupid amount of money. Turns out that isn't even the full edition, and they have the absolute gall to charge an extra £25 for new DLC. Greed doesn't begin to describe it.
2k你个四风的玩意,端上一个半成品给玩家玩,新出的dlc笔毫与刀锋依旧半成品还想着原价付,这么被刺我们这些老玩家,你在看看你这狗屎七代和六代的差距,蛮族势力与城邦合成了一个独立势力,既没有了蛮族的压迫感,又少了城邦的多元化特性,宗主一个独立势力挑一个特性的机制抹平了一些城邦的优劣高低之分,同样降低了游戏的可玩性与博弈性,再来说你删除的尤里卡与鼓舞,大科学家、大预言家、大商人这些前代优秀的机制,你来告诉我打神机制下我们玩家怎么拼的过那些开挂的ai?六代至少可以上政策卡造祠堂派遣总督老马不断砍树暴开拓者铺城来抹平差距,让我们种田玩家不至于太过枯燥也能享受游戏…
원본 리뷰 허브에서 전문 보기 ↗Let me preface this entire view by saying the most recent Test of Time update, as well as the Brush and Blade pack, has made the game much more enjoyable than the first few times I gave the game tries. However, this game is still far off the mark of the previous games in the s…
원본 리뷰 허브에서 전문 보기 ↗so i got this more as a gift by a friend that gift me a code and complete 1 match on normal dificulty as Benjamin Franklin from start age to modern age i got some things to say about this. if you think this is CIV 6 but more upgrade and more less cartoonish grapics, you are sadl…
원본 리뷰 허브에서 전문 보기 ↗Incomplete game. They charge you $80 for it and then another $30 for each DLC. The win conditions are confusing, and you don't seem to be able to win until the final age. This makes the early ages tedious, almost like something you have to power through with no tension or risk. E…
원본 리뷰 허브에서 전문 보기 ↗I've played every Civ game, probably 10s of thousands of hours combined. This isn't it. Half the price of the full game for each DLC content pack tells you all you need to know about their priorities.
+ Very beautiful game; + Better system of communication with city-state; + Better influence of benefits from city-states; + Better organization for armies with comanders; - Terrible UI; - Terrible the system of three ages, which breaks an atmosphere; - Illogical choice in each a…
원본 리뷰 허브에서 전문 보기 ↗can you guys stop ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ changing major mechanics in the game please also no one is buying your ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ priced dlc's
New DLC to pay when bugs are still not fix. Going back to the old civi 6 because that game you can play forever.
首先讲一下文明6我玩了接近900小时,文明7玩了300小时,2年左右时间,肯定是喜欢这个系列,并且我也不否认文明7的制作质量。给差评是因为吃相难看,我买的奠基者版本像个小丑,现在又是打折,又是出另外需要购买的DLC,刚开始买的我相信大多数都是文明6的资深玩家,让这部分最想支持你的人吃最多的亏,不太好。然后讲一下游戏,刚出我就买了首先刚开始是个半成品,没关系给你些时间,最近又开始玩,还是一样的问题,四种胜利趋向同质化,没有相互制衡的感觉。然后是优化很差,每次进游戏要好久(5060刚买的游戏本)。bug很多摄像机每次都会往某一个方向移,摁了对应的方向键才会停…
원본 리뷰 허브에서 전문 보기 ↗Compared to Civ VI, VII is a truly beautiful work of art. The art team outdid themselves, but sadly, that is the only positive here. The DLC is a scam, the gameplay is buggy (I've had to restart hours into a game several times because things just break), and the Crisis Policy a…
원본 리뷰 허브에서 전문 보기 ↗Adquieres la Edición Fundadores de más de 100 euros y el juego sale a medio acabar, no conforme con eso quieren que pague por el ultimo Dlc 30 pavos cuando lo debería de tener gratis... Firaxis estáis locos, cambiar la marca del café que os esta haciendo mal..
250 hrs pre–Test of Time, 300 hrs post–Test of Time (current: Ver 1.4.2) First, my respect to the Firaxis team behind the Test of Time update. Overhauling the game this fundamentally, in direct response to community feedback, in just a few months, took real effort and sincerit…
원본 리뷰 허브에서 전문 보기 ↗Game is mediocre at best. Don't buy it at full price if you HAVE to buy it. The 30 dollar dlc being essentially a leader pack is scummy as hell, Compare it to civ 5 or civ 6 which were essentially overhauls of the game.
这本体本来ui就是一坨,内容也不够丰富,平衡基本没有,dlc还要钱,出卖亲🐎呢?
It's not terrible by any means, but it's just simply not as good as previous Civ games, whilst being far more expensive. Whilst it has improved since release, it still retains too much of an arcadey feel - I am simply being led by the nose through a series of short term objective…
원본 리뷰 허브에서 전문 보기 ↗After seeing how much they're charging for the DLC's honestly get ****
If I could get a refund, I would. After all the backlash; The team are still happy pumping out DLC civs and leaders like the game and devs are in our good graces.
The prices are getting ridiculous. What was the point of the founder's edition if not for new DLCs?
Founders Edition and then add more paid DLC after this? If someone pays the amount we paid for founders edition you should get all DLC? The clocks ♥♥♥♥ boys.
哪怕一年多了依旧还是全方位的半成品,就是个Early Access模式,DLC吃相也相当难看。没入的建议继续观望。
This is the worst pile of ♥♥♥♥ i have ever played, the art direction has no soul, the UI looks AI generated (not a joke the boxes don't fit), scummy dlc practices hiding basic mechanics behind 30$ price tags, wants you to ♥♥♥♥ your own mom to even start the game basic game functi…
원본 리뷰 허브에서 전문 보기 ↗Unfortunately, as a long-time lover of Civilization games all the way back from Civ 2, I have to say that I cannot recommend this game. If this was the first Civ game ever by some indie studio I think I would like it enough despite its flaws to recommend it. But as this is the …
원본 리뷰 허브에서 전문 보기 ↗Civilization I is the game that made me a PC gamer. Since then, I've played every Civilization title extensively, along with countless other 4X games over the past 30 years. I deliberately waited until the "Test of Time" update before forming my own opinion about Civilization VII…
원본 리뷰 허브에서 전문 보기 ↗This game is honestly unplayable due to poor programming. Units constantly just walk the completely opposite direction where you you tell them to go. Embarrassing that this game is a year old and still this bad. It is obvious no one in leadership at Take Two knows anything about…
원본 리뷰 허브에서 전문 보기 ↗내가 이돈을주고 이딴쓰레기를 샀다고? 싶은 기분임 문명이라는 프랜차이즈를 살리지도 못했고, 4K 전략시뮬이라는 본질적인 가치에서도 멀어지는 단순 보드게임 수준의 게임성을 가지고 있다는게 제일 큰 단점임 4K 전략시뮬에서는 하나하나의 행동이나 턴소비 만으로도 그게 나중에 큰 차이점이 벌어짐, 예를들어 고전시대때 콜로세움을 지었으면 그 주변으로 도시를 건설해야되서 멀리 확장을 할 필요가 없어지거나, 고전시대에 철을 발견 못했으면 바로 기마병 쪽으로 테크를 변경하거나 하는식으로 변형이 되어야 함 (문…
원본 리뷰 허브에서 전문 보기 ↗I've always been a Civ fan, every game has been an upgrade of the game before with better experience. However i can't say the same for Civ VII. Yes it has beter graphics ad cosmetics, the Commander battle system and the vertical city build is great, but the overall gameplay is we…
원본 리뷰 허브에서 전문 보기 ↗£100 for drip fed "dlc" whats going on? thats crazy. Spent around a hour trying to see why anyone would even spend £25 for all that dlc. £100! Plus the 2k screen is always in the top corner of the screen while in game? and it says legend enabled. (they call it legend mode and all…
원본 리뷰 허브에서 전문 보기 ↗I have played all Civ. Moreover, Sid M games even before Civ. Played, Microprose games on C64 and all other platforms. This is a disaster. I am trying to like it; but, it is hard. They still don't get it, you don't take away content, you add more content. You don't mess-up game d…
원본 리뷰 허브에서 전문 보기 ↗This is a lazy civ game. They did not add a whole information/modern era. How do you have this era in other civs but for some reason this one only goes to WWI/WWII era technology. This game with try to gouge the player base with updates and DLC that will amount to what they shoul…
원본 리뷰 허브에서 전문 보기 ↗I play this game because I have to kill time and distract myself but its been out for a year and they go backwards and cause bugs, Part 2 of 1.3.1 destroyed peace negotiations with lazy hard coding and no actual negotiation, if you hit a block like, its a city, has a wonder, or …
원본 리뷰 허브에서 전문 보기 ↗I am updating this review after each patch. I am trying to be positive and giving it benefit of doubt. I will however not by the DLC's not included from the start, unless the game improves significantly. This feels like an indie game made by Civ fans that will be in perpetual ea…
원본 리뷰 허브에서 전문 보기 ↗My review is going from "recommended" to "not recommended". While the game has a solid base, it is now clear that Firaxis has decided to shove the age transition mechanic down our troat and the Test of Time update really was a slap in the face, if not a kick in the balls. The …
원본 리뷰 허브에서 전문 보기 ↗Update August 2026: ich lag total falsch. 6-12 Monate bis mir das Spiel Spaß macht war übertrieben optimistisch. Ich erhöhe auf 24 bis 36 Monate.... Von der Grafik mal abgesehen überwiegen für mich die negativen Dinge so stark, das man aktuell absolut von einem Kauf abraten muss…
원본 리뷰 허브에서 전문 보기 ↗I have been a fan of Civ games since Civ2, and I've loved every game until this one. Civilization has had peaks and valleys, but the rough flow of the game - start at antiquity and progress to the future - has been consistently fun every iteration. I feel like that has stopped wi…
원본 리뷰 허브에서 전문 보기 ↗여러 업데이트가 진행되고 DLC를 전부 구매한 후 평가 수정. 막 출시했을 당시 정가를 주고 샀을 때는 매우 부정적인 수준이었으나, 현재는 그냥 부정적인 수준. 그래픽 표현이나 건물 등의 디테일, 미감은 이전 작들에 비해 나아졌다. 결국 장점은 그래픽 쪽밖에 없다. 시스템이 크게 바뀌었고, 전반적으로 많이 간소화됐다. 시리즈를 처음 접하는 사람이라면 좀 더 편하게 적응할 수 있을 듯하다. 여전히 아쉬운 부분은 3개 시대로 나뉜 구조와 문명 변경 시스템이다. 시대가 전환되는 순간 한 턴 만에…
원본 리뷰 허브에서 전문 보기 ↗I'm 48 years old so I have played every Civ since the original. This one is way off. The best I can describe it is that it feels like it is "dumbed down"... like, you've been riding roller coasters for years and the new one is opening and you're all excited and you race to the…
원본 리뷰 허브에서 전문 보기 ↗Here are some suggestions for what I think should change to make the game much more interesting. -Strategic resources should remain the same as in Civilization VI. Iron, oil, uranium, and other minerals useful for industry. -Strategic resources should maintain a gap between civ…
원본 리뷰 허브에서 전문 보기 ↗